I’m shocked OP needed to even make a post about this. Rightful ownership of property vs a “promise” which didn’t take into account death? Your friend didn’t want to hear it from his wife on purchases as she’d give him grief about spending so much there. You think now she rather have them or not? These are legally theirs
After 9 months there’s nothing they will do
I don’t follow celebs and could care less about Travis Scott but what exactly is the point of this post? A grand jury reviewed evidence and decided NOT to indict as there was no evidence of criminal wrongdoing. Anything else is heresy
Go buy his shoes or not but a large problem with today’s culture is just jumping onto whatever is seen and talked about on social media without actually looking at vetted information. In this case, the District Attorney and Grand Jury said no evidence of crime occurred
It’s not just the price point but also a watch that will still be significant in the next generation. Lowest price point would probably be for something like a Tudor or Omega, and something timeless there