In a post from a few days ago, I noticed that someone mentioned that they were afraid to post about their dislike of the Tudor BB58 for fear of downvoting. You know what? The BB is a boring watch that’s not worth the money, and Tudor wouldn’t be half as popular as it is without the connection to Rolex. If Rolexes were as attainable as they were in past years, cut that by a factor of 10. Would you really buy a BB if the reality were that you could just save a little bit more and get a Rolex Submariner? That’s my hot take. What’s yours?

  • Cyimian@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Heritage is massively overrated.

    Most of the exciting and fun watches are coming from the younger and independent brands in my opinion.

    Most of the legacy brands don’t have a continuous history and have been bought/sold multiple times and in many cases resurrected with questionable links to the past.