In a post from a few days ago, I noticed that someone mentioned that they were afraid to post about their dislike of the Tudor BB58 for fear of downvoting. You know what? The BB is a boring watch that’s not worth the money, and Tudor wouldn’t be half as popular as it is without the connection to Rolex. If Rolexes were as attainable as they were in past years, cut that by a factor of 10. Would you really buy a BB if the reality were that you could just save a little bit more and get a Rolex Submariner? That’s my hot take. What’s yours?

  • cookie12685@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Tudor has completely lost touch with their purpose, they should cost as much as a Tissot

    • bomgd3@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Oh please, they are far higher quality than Tissot and in the realm of luxury watches are actually a great deal.

    • RickyPeePee03@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      At least back in the day you’d get a watch that was 95% a Rolex (minus the movement and dial)